https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300258 A partner may be treated as liable for a firm's unpaid telephone charges where the default continues and the partner remained part of the firm when the dues accrued. Applying the Indian Telegraph Act, Telegraph Rules, and the joint and several liability principle under the Partnership Act, the text states that the telephone authority could disconnect the partner's personal line for the firm's arrears. It also states that the power to disconnect under rule 443 was not spent by a prior exercise and could be used again while the default subsisted and a line remained available for disconnection. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:40:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300258 A partner may be treated as liable for a firm's unpaid telephone charges where the default continues and the partner remained part of the firm when the dues accrued. Applying the Indian Telegraph Act, Telegraph Rules, and the joint and several liability principle under the Partnership Act, the text states that the telephone authority could disconnect the partner's personal line for the firm's arrears. It also states that the power to disconnect under rule 443 was not spent by a prior exercise and could be used again while the default subsisted and a line remained available for disconnection. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300258