https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300252 The appeal was found to be filed within the permissible time frame despite delays in obtaining judgment copies. The trial court's inference that the three cheques were post-dated was not supported by the evidence, and the court ruled that they were issued on the dates mentioned. Additionally, the trial court's interpretation of starting the limitation period from the date the cheques were handed over was rejected in favor of starting from the dates on the cheques. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the trial court's judgment was set aside, and the suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff with costs and interest awarded. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:02:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300252 The appeal was found to be filed within the permissible time frame despite delays in obtaining judgment copies. The trial court's inference that the three cheques were post-dated was not supported by the evidence, and the court ruled that they were issued on the dates mentioned. Additionally, the trial court's interpretation of starting the limitation period from the date the cheques were handed over was rejected in favor of starting from the dates on the cheques. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the trial court's judgment was set aside, and the suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff with costs and interest awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300252