<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 732 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing 60% depreciation on the software license as part of the computer, not as an intangible asset. Additionally, expenses for plant expansion were treated as revenue deductions, not preliminary expenses under section 35D, emphasizing consistency in tax assessments. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming compliance with the Income Tax Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:53:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 732 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing 60% depreciation on the software license as part of the computer, not as an intangible asset. Additionally, expenses for plant expansion were treated as revenue deductions, not preliminary expenses under section 35D, emphasizing consistency in tax assessments. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming compliance with the Income Tax Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>