<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 709 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417244</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs cannot be disallowed, and penalty cannot be sustained, where the assessee received goods at the registered premises, maintained statutory records, used the inputs in manufacture, and made payments through banking channels. The Tribunal found no independent evidence of an alternative source of procurement or of cash return against cheque payments; the Revenue relied mainly on supplier and transporter statements linked to investigation. Applying its earlier decision in a similar matter, the Tribunal held that the evidentiary foundation for denying credit and imposing penalty was not made out, and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 709 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417244</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs cannot be disallowed, and penalty cannot be sustained, where the assessee received goods at the registered premises, maintained statutory records, used the inputs in manufacture, and made payments through banking channels. The Tribunal found no independent evidence of an alternative source of procurement or of cash return against cheque payments; the Revenue relied mainly on supplier and transporter statements linked to investigation. Applying its earlier decision in a similar matter, the Tribunal held that the evidentiary foundation for denying credit and imposing penalty was not made out, and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>