https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417241 Direct payment of the amount ordered under a revisional order to the complainant, followed by an acknowledged receipt and supporting affidavit, was treated as sufficient compliance. The court held that routing the payment through court was a procedural mode rather than a condition affecting substance, and the Magistrate could record the amount as realised and paid in the fine register. Refusal to recognise compliance merely because the payment was not deposited in court was unwarranted, and the matter was directed to be closed with satisfaction recorded in the fine register. en-us Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:49:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417241 Direct payment of the amount ordered under a revisional order to the complainant, followed by an acknowledged receipt and supporting affidavit, was treated as sufficient compliance. The court held that routing the payment through court was a procedural mode rather than a condition affecting substance, and the Magistrate could record the amount as realised and paid in the fine register. Refusal to recognise compliance merely because the payment was not deposited in court was unwarranted, and the matter was directed to be closed with satisfaction recorded in the fine register. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417241