<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1221 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300243</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the rejection of refund claims for input services and capital goods under the amended Rule 89(5) and Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. The appeals were dismissed, affirming that refund of ITC on input services and capital goods is not admissible under the inverted duty structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1221 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300243</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the rejection of refund claims for input services and capital goods under the amended Rule 89(5) and Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. The appeals were dismissed, affirming that refund of ITC on input services and capital goods is not admissible under the inverted duty structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>