<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1492 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the Petition for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. The judgment emphasized the independence of the loan transaction, the validity of the default, and the maintainability of the Petition despite involvement of multiple entities in providing financial assistance to the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1492 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the Petition for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. The judgment emphasized the independence of the loan transaction, the validity of the default, and the maintainability of the Petition despite involvement of multiple entities in providing financial assistance to the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>