<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 18 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27757</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of allowing depreciation on roads within a race course premises, considering them as part of the &quot;building.&quot; The court distinguished a Supreme Court decision and cited precedents from Bombay and Madras High Courts supporting this interpretation. Emphasizing consistency among High Court views, the court held that the amendment in Income-tax Rules was a clarification, affirming depreciation eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 18 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27757</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of allowing depreciation on roads within a race course premises, considering them as part of the &quot;building.&quot; The court distinguished a Supreme Court decision and cited precedents from Bombay and Madras High Courts supporting this interpretation. Emphasizing consistency among High Court views, the court held that the amendment in Income-tax Rules was a clarification, affirming depreciation eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>