https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300238 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the trial court's findings on the limitation issue and the judgment. The suit was remanded for a fresh trial to determine the actual date of delivery of the cheque, which would mark the start of the limitation period. The application for condonation of delay was deemed not maintainable as the court lacked discretion to extend the prescribed period for suits. The appellant was entitled to a refund of the court fee, and the parties were directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:24:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300238 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the trial court's findings on the limitation issue and the judgment. The suit was remanded for a fresh trial to determine the actual date of delivery of the cheque, which would mark the start of the limitation period. The application for condonation of delay was deemed not maintainable as the court lacked discretion to extend the prescribed period for suits. The appellant was entitled to a refund of the court fee, and the parties were directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300238