https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300234 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction remains available to correct an illegal refusal to exercise jurisdiction, even where an appellate remedy may also exist. In a suit for recovery based on dishonoured cheques, the right to sue accrues on dishonour, and the claim is not governed by Article 19 of the Limitation Act; where no specific article applies, the residuary Article 113 governs and the suit was within time. The rejection of the plaint as time-barred was therefore unsustainable, and rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) could not stand. en-us Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:17:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300234 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction remains available to correct an illegal refusal to exercise jurisdiction, even where an appellate remedy may also exist. In a suit for recovery based on dishonoured cheques, the right to sue accrues on dishonour, and the claim is not governed by Article 19 of the Limitation Act; where no specific article applies, the residuary Article 113 governs and the suit was within time. The rejection of the plaint as time-barred was therefore unsustainable, and rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300234