https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417237 The High Court admitted the petition challenging the appellate order and related orders regarding discrepancies in GST returns leading to potential double taxation. The Court directed the State to file a counter affidavit and allowed the petitioner to file a rejoinder affidavit. The matter was listed for further hearing, with an interim order preventing coercive action if a security amount was provided to the Assessing Officer. The delay in constituting the GST Tribunal in Uttar Pradesh compounded the petitioner's challenges, necessitating Court intervention to address the issues of double taxation and procedural hurdles. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417237 The High Court admitted the petition challenging the appellate order and related orders regarding discrepancies in GST returns leading to potential double taxation. The Court directed the State to file a counter affidavit and allowed the petitioner to file a rejoinder affidavit. The matter was listed for further hearing, with an interim order preventing coercive action if a security amount was provided to the Assessing Officer. The delay in constituting the GST Tribunal in Uttar Pradesh compounded the petitioner's challenges, necessitating Court intervention to address the issues of double taxation and procedural hurdles. Case-Laws GST Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417237