https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417233 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account under Section 83(2) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The court found that the attachment, made on 11 October 2019, ceased to have effect after one year as per the Act. Therefore, the court made the rule absolute, directing the parties to act on an authenticated copy of the order, without any order as to costs. en-us Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417233 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account under Section 83(2) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The court found that the attachment, made on 11 October 2019, ceased to have effect after one year as per the Act. Therefore, the court made the rule absolute, directing the parties to act on an authenticated copy of the order, without any order as to costs. Case-Laws GST Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417233