<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 695 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417230</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) CGST, Jaipur dismissed the appellant&#039;s refund claim for input tax credit on exported goods. The appellant filed refund applications on 27-8-2020 for exports from April-August 2018, but the Export Goods Manifest showed goods left India by 31-8-2018. Under Section 54(1) CGST Act 2017 and relevant notifications, refund applications must be filed within two years from the relevant date, requiring filing by 31-8-2020. Since fresh applications were filed on 8-9-2020 after deficiency memo, they exceeded the statutory time limit. The adjudicating authority correctly rejected the claims as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 695 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417230</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) CGST, Jaipur dismissed the appellant&#039;s refund claim for input tax credit on exported goods. The appellant filed refund applications on 27-8-2020 for exports from April-August 2018, but the Export Goods Manifest showed goods left India by 31-8-2018. Under Section 54(1) CGST Act 2017 and relevant notifications, refund applications must be filed within two years from the relevant date, requiring filing by 31-8-2020. Since fresh applications were filed on 8-9-2020 after deficiency memo, they exceeded the statutory time limit. The adjudicating authority correctly rejected the claims as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>