<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 691 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417226</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the order rejecting objections, as the reassessment for the assessment year 2014-15 was deemed a mere change of opinion without tangible material justifying income escapement. The Court emphasized that reassessment must be grounded on substantive reasons, not subjective opinion, citing relevant case law. The petition was allowed, declaring the notice and order legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 691 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417226</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the order rejecting objections, as the reassessment for the assessment year 2014-15 was deemed a mere change of opinion without tangible material justifying income escapement. The Court emphasized that reassessment must be grounded on substantive reasons, not subjective opinion, citing relevant case law. The petition was allowed, declaring the notice and order legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>