<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 674 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of Rs. 69,602/- under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. Contributions towards EPF and ESI, although delayed, were made before the due date of filing the return of income, following precedents and legislative amendments. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance, ruling in favor of the assessee. The order was pronounced on 29/11/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 08:44:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 674 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of Rs. 69,602/- under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. Contributions towards EPF and ESI, although delayed, were made before the due date of filing the return of income, following precedents and legislative amendments. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance, ruling in favor of the assessee. The order was pronounced on 29/11/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>