<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 671 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417206</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the petition for restoration of the company&#039;s name under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company demonstrated ongoing business activities before the strike off and provided evidence of its intentions to continue operations. The Tribunal changed the company&#039;s status from &quot;strike off&quot; to &quot;Active,&quot; imposing a cost of Rs. 50,000 for revival. The company was required to fulfill pending statutory compliances within 30 days, with restrictions on asset alienation until compliance. Disqualified directors were not automatically reinstated. The order emphasized ongoing compliance obligations and the Registrar&#039;s authority to enforce statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 08:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 671 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417206</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the petition for restoration of the company&#039;s name under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company demonstrated ongoing business activities before the strike off and provided evidence of its intentions to continue operations. The Tribunal changed the company&#039;s status from &quot;strike off&quot; to &quot;Active,&quot; imposing a cost of Rs. 50,000 for revival. The company was required to fulfill pending statutory compliances within 30 days, with restrictions on asset alienation until compliance. Disqualified directors were not automatically reinstated. The order emphasized ongoing compliance obligations and the Registrar&#039;s authority to enforce statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>