https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417197 The appellate court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the NI Act for issuing a bounced cheque. Despite challenges raised in the revision petition regarding the lack of proper assessment of evidence and disputes over the delivery of medicines, the Court found no errors in the lower courts' appreciation of the case. The accused's failure to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act and provide a convincing defense led to the dismissal of the revision petition, as the Court declined to interfere based on the presented grounds. en-us Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jan 2022 09:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417197 The appellate court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the NI Act for issuing a bounced cheque. Despite challenges raised in the revision petition regarding the lack of proper assessment of evidence and disputes over the delivery of medicines, the Court found no errors in the lower courts' appreciation of the case. The accused's failure to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act and provide a convincing defense led to the dismissal of the revision petition, as the Court declined to interfere based on the presented grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417197