<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27749</link>
    <description>The court remanded the case to the Tribunal to determine if Shanmugar Mills had goodwill before liquidation and if it retained any value despite being leased out. The Tribunal must reassess based on the company&#039;s historical performance and other relevant factors. The court returned the question unanswered due to insufficient material on record and ordered no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:27:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27749</link>
      <description>The court remanded the case to the Tribunal to determine if Shanmugar Mills had goodwill before liquidation and if it retained any value despite being leased out. The Tribunal must reassess based on the company&#039;s historical performance and other relevant factors. The court returned the question unanswered due to insufficient material on record and ordered no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>