<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1477 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, as the alleged debt did not qualify as an &quot;Operational Debt&quot; as defined by the Code. The judgment emphasized the necessity of aligning claims with legal definitions and requirements under the insolvency framework, stressing the importance of clarity and specificity in initiating insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1477 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, as the alleged debt did not qualify as an &quot;Operational Debt&quot; as defined by the Code. The judgment emphasized the necessity of aligning claims with legal definitions and requirements under the insolvency framework, stressing the importance of clarity and specificity in initiating insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>