<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RCM Notification 13/2017 Central Tax ( Rate) status of Limited Liability Partnership</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117766</link>
    <description>The Notification&#039;s explanation both adopts the inclusive Companies Act definition of &quot;body corporate&quot; and separately provides that an LLP &quot;shall also be considered as a partnership firm or a firm,&quot; producing an interpretive conflict. Contributors note precedent and administrative guidance suggesting LLPs may not uniformly be &quot;body corporate,&quot; while others advise that, given the Companies Act reference and the RCM scheme&#039;s revenue-protection purpose, treating an LLP as a body corporate for reverse-charge compliance is a conservative and practicable approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:36:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>RCM Notification 13/2017 Central Tax ( Rate) status of Limited Liability Partnership</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117766</link>
      <description>The Notification&#039;s explanation both adopts the inclusive Companies Act definition of &quot;body corporate&quot; and separately provides that an LLP &quot;shall also be considered as a partnership firm or a firm,&quot; producing an interpretive conflict. Contributors note precedent and administrative guidance suggesting LLPs may not uniformly be &quot;body corporate,&quot; while others advise that, given the Companies Act reference and the RCM scheme&#039;s revenue-protection purpose, treating an LLP as a body corporate for reverse-charge compliance is a conservative and practicable approach.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:36:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>