<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 820 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300211</link>
    <description>The Division Bench of the High Court set aside the dismissal of applications by assignees seeking re-conveyance of properties, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and proper notice to parties. The Court remanded the matters for re-hearing on merits, stressing the importance of distinguishing between issues of limitation and merits in legal proceedings. The assignees were granted the opportunity for a fresh consideration of their entitlement to re-conveyance, with a request for priority due to the prolonged litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:05:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 820 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300211</link>
      <description>The Division Bench of the High Court set aside the dismissal of applications by assignees seeking re-conveyance of properties, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and proper notice to parties. The Court remanded the matters for re-hearing on merits, stressing the importance of distinguishing between issues of limitation and merits in legal proceedings. The assignees were granted the opportunity for a fresh consideration of their entitlement to re-conveyance, with a request for priority due to the prolonged litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>