<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 651 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the disallowance was not applicable in this case as the cash expenditure was part of the closing stock and not claimed as a deduction, thus not warranting disallowance under section 40A(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 651 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the disallowance was not applicable in this case as the cash expenditure was part of the closing stock and not claimed as a deduction, thus not warranting disallowance under section 40A(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>