<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 649 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417184</link>
    <description>A warranty or contractual replacement provision is deductible when it reflects a present obligation arising from past sales and can be reliably estimated, so the battery replacement provision was allowed. Ad hoc disallowance of sales promotion expense was deleted because bills and vouchers supported business expenditure and mere non-disclosure of recipients did not prove bogus spending. Donations made by account payee cheque to recognised political parties and charitable institutions were held deductible, and the donor was not required to verify later utilisation by the donee. Travelling expense disallowance was only partly sustained, while the closing stock addition was deleted for want of specific defects in valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 649 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417184</link>
      <description>A warranty or contractual replacement provision is deductible when it reflects a present obligation arising from past sales and can be reliably estimated, so the battery replacement provision was allowed. Ad hoc disallowance of sales promotion expense was deleted because bills and vouchers supported business expenditure and mere non-disclosure of recipients did not prove bogus spending. Donations made by account payee cheque to recognised political parties and charitable institutions were held deductible, and the donor was not required to verify later utilisation by the donee. Travelling expense disallowance was only partly sustained, while the closing stock addition was deleted for want of specific defects in valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>