<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 648 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417183</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses related to payments to the Registrar of Companies (ROC) as capital expenditure, based on legal precedents and specific circumstances of the case. The tribunal dismissed all three appeals by the assessee, emphasizing that expenses towards ROC payments were deemed capital expenditure, even if incidentally beneficial for business operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 648 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417183</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses related to payments to the Registrar of Companies (ROC) as capital expenditure, based on legal precedents and specific circumstances of the case. The tribunal dismissed all three appeals by the assessee, emphasizing that expenses towards ROC payments were deemed capital expenditure, even if incidentally beneficial for business operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>