<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 633 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was barred by limitation as it was issued after the expiry of two years from the end of the financial year in which the original assessment order was passed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the revision order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 633 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was barred by limitation as it was issued after the expiry of two years from the end of the financial year in which the original assessment order was passed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the revision order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>