<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 615 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417150</link>
    <description>The Court directed the application seeking modification of a judgment regarding the refund of education cess and higher education cess paid with excise duty under exemption notifications to be heard by a three-Judge Bench. The decision was made due to conflicting interpretations of the law, emphasizing the importance of considering previous judgments in resolving legal complexities surrounding the refund of education cess and higher education cess.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 615 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417150</link>
      <description>The Court directed the application seeking modification of a judgment regarding the refund of education cess and higher education cess paid with excise duty under exemption notifications to be heard by a three-Judge Bench. The decision was made due to conflicting interpretations of the law, emphasizing the importance of considering previous judgments in resolving legal complexities surrounding the refund of education cess and higher education cess.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>