https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417147 The court affirmed the lower courts' judgments, upholding the accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused's arguments regarding misuse of the cheque and lack of financial capacity by the complainant were dismissed. The court found that the evidence supported the complainant's claim, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139. The issue of statutory notice compliance was also addressed, with the court ruling in favor of the complainant. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case was dismissed, and a Non-Bailable Warrant was directed for the accused's incarceration. en-us Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:55:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417147 The court affirmed the lower courts' judgments, upholding the accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused's arguments regarding misuse of the cheque and lack of financial capacity by the complainant were dismissed. The court found that the evidence supported the complainant's claim, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139. The issue of statutory notice compliance was also addressed, with the court ruling in favor of the complainant. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case was dismissed, and a Non-Bailable Warrant was directed for the accused's incarceration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417147