<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 34 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27736</link>
    <description>The court remitted the matter for fresh disposal due to inconsistencies and lack of clarity in the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the allowance and disallowance of expenses under s. 57(iii) for the relevant assessment years. The judgment emphasized the importance of establishing a clear nexus between claimed expenses and income earned to ensure that only relevant and necessary expenses are allowed as deductions under s. 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 34 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27736</link>
      <description>The court remitted the matter for fresh disposal due to inconsistencies and lack of clarity in the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the allowance and disallowance of expenses under s. 57(iii) for the relevant assessment years. The judgment emphasized the importance of establishing a clear nexus between claimed expenses and income earned to ensure that only relevant and necessary expenses are allowed as deductions under s. 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>