<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1655 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300204</link>
    <description>The High Court recorded the petitioner&#039;s memo stating compliance with its earlier order and noted that the respondents had acceded to the petitioner&#039;s prayer. It also recorded that the Nodal Officer had referred the matter to GSTN and that a decision was in process. On that factual basis, the writ petition was disposed of as closed, with no order as to costs, and without any further adjudication on the merits of the underlying referral.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1655 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300204</link>
      <description>The High Court recorded the petitioner&#039;s memo stating compliance with its earlier order and noted that the respondents had acceded to the petitioner&#039;s prayer. It also recorded that the Nodal Officer had referred the matter to GSTN and that a decision was in process. On that factual basis, the writ petition was disposed of as closed, with no order as to costs, and without any further adjudication on the merits of the underlying referral.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>