<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300202</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to issue a No Objection Certificate for five out of eight Capital Gains Accounts, allowing the petitioner to withdraw funds for a new house investment. The remaining three accounts were to cover the tax demand, with the petitioner given the opportunity to present objections. The respondent was instructed to issue the certificate promptly and address the petitioner&#039;s objections within specified time frames, without awarding costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 20:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300202</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to issue a No Objection Certificate for five out of eight Capital Gains Accounts, allowing the petitioner to withdraw funds for a new house investment. The remaining three accounts were to cover the tax demand, with the petitioner given the opportunity to present objections. The respondent was instructed to issue the certificate promptly and address the petitioner&#039;s objections within specified time frames, without awarding costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>