https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300188 Rule 9(i)(d) under the Punjab Medical College Education Service (Class-I) Rules, 1978 was construed as a quota rule for recruitment from two sources, so the roster had to operate on vacancies as they arose rather than on total cadre strength. On that basis, the Court explained that reservation jurisprudence under Article 16(4) did not govern a source-based quota between promotees and direct recruits, and the disputed vacancy had to be identified through the operative roster. The proviso to Rule 3 was treated as a limited deeming provision protecting only incumbents in post on commencement of the rules, and it could not be expanded to reopen earlier recruitment cycles. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jan 2022 17:02:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300188 Rule 9(i)(d) under the Punjab Medical College Education Service (Class-I) Rules, 1978 was construed as a quota rule for recruitment from two sources, so the roster had to operate on vacancies as they arose rather than on total cadre strength. On that basis, the Court explained that reservation jurisprudence under Article 16(4) did not govern a source-based quota between promotees and direct recruits, and the disputed vacancy had to be identified through the operative roster. The proviso to Rule 3 was treated as a limited deeming provision protecting only incumbents in post on commencement of the rules, and it could not be expanded to reopen earlier recruitment cycles. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300188