<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 666 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300187</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee to demonstrate agricultural income for tax exemption. The Court reiterated that it could not interfere with factual findings unless unsupported by evidence or against the law. The judgment stressed the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support claims of agricultural income for tax exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 16:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 666 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300187</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee to demonstrate agricultural income for tax exemption. The Court reiterated that it could not interfere with factual findings unless unsupported by evidence or against the law. The judgment stressed the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support claims of agricultural income for tax exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>