<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 564 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300186</link>
    <description>Central excise dispute involving the assessee and the tax department was carried to the Supreme Court, which recorded only that the appeal was dismissed. The text does not set out the legal issue, reasoning, or any substantive clarification on duty, classification, exemption, or procedure, so no further principle can be reliably extracted beyond the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 564 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300186</link>
      <description>Central excise dispute involving the assessee and the tax department was carried to the Supreme Court, which recorded only that the appeal was dismissed. The text does not set out the legal issue, reasoning, or any substantive clarification on duty, classification, exemption, or procedure, so no further principle can be reliably extracted beyond the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>