<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 50 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27733</link>
    <description>The court held that the company declared more than the statutory percentage of dividend, rendering Section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, inapplicable. The orders of the Income-tax Officer and the Commissioner were set aside, and the petitioners were entitled to a refund of the tax paid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction under Section 263 was upheld, and the petitioners were awarded costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 50 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27733</link>
      <description>The court held that the company declared more than the statutory percentage of dividend, rendering Section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, inapplicable. The orders of the Income-tax Officer and the Commissioner were set aside, and the petitioners were entitled to a refund of the tax paid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction under Section 263 was upheld, and the petitioners were awarded costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>