<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 590 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417125</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding it unjustly imposed due to the lack of fault on the part of the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had not been given adequate time to respond to the Department&#039;s queries, leading to the incorrect imposition of the penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 590 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417125</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding it unjustly imposed due to the lack of fault on the part of the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had not been given adequate time to respond to the Department&#039;s queries, leading to the incorrect imposition of the penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>