<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 577 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417112</link>
    <description>Cancellation of bail requires a stricter standard than refusal at the initial stage and cannot be ordered mechanically. Once bail has been granted, it may be withdrawn only on cogent and overwhelming grounds showing misuse of liberty, supervening circumstances, tampering with evidence, or risk of absconding. On the facts noted, there was no allegation of evidence tampering, no material indicating flight risk or breach of bail conditions, and no persuasive basis for further custodial necessity. The release of the seized watches and payment of penalty also weakened the request for cancellation. The petitions for cancellation of bail were therefore rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 577 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417112</link>
      <description>Cancellation of bail requires a stricter standard than refusal at the initial stage and cannot be ordered mechanically. Once bail has been granted, it may be withdrawn only on cogent and overwhelming grounds showing misuse of liberty, supervening circumstances, tampering with evidence, or risk of absconding. On the facts noted, there was no allegation of evidence tampering, no material indicating flight risk or breach of bail conditions, and no persuasive basis for further custodial necessity. The release of the seized watches and payment of penalty also weakened the request for cancellation. The petitions for cancellation of bail were therefore rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>