<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 37 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27726</link>
    <description>Dharmada collections are not part of the sale price or a surcharge on it, because they are paid by customers in addition to the price and the purchase is only the occasion for payment. On that settled characterisation, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition in the Goshala and Dharmada accounts, and the deletion was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 37 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27726</link>
      <description>Dharmada collections are not part of the sale price or a surcharge on it, because they are paid by customers in addition to the price and the purchase is only the occasion for payment. On that settled characterisation, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition in the Goshala and Dharmada accounts, and the deletion was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>