<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 572 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417107</link>
    <description>A company petition disposed of under a settlement can be revived where the settlement is breached and the Tribunal had reserved liberty to restore the matter on default. Repeated non-compliance with the agreed payment terms, including failure to meet the last opportunity granted, established default under the settlement. On that basis, restoration of the main company petition was warranted, and the petition was revived for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 572 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417107</link>
      <description>A company petition disposed of under a settlement can be revived where the settlement is breached and the Tribunal had reserved liberty to restore the matter on default. Repeated non-compliance with the agreed payment terms, including failure to meet the last opportunity granted, established default under the settlement. On that basis, restoration of the main company petition was warranted, and the petition was revived for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>