<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 564 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417099</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the supply of diesel generators on hire basis did not amount to &#039;supply of tangible goods for use&#039; (STGU) service liable to service tax. The Tribunal found that the transaction involved the transfer of the right to use the generators, constituting a deemed sale rather than a service. As a result, the appeals filed by the Appellant and its Director were allowed, and the demands for service tax, penalties, and interest were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 564 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417099</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the supply of diesel generators on hire basis did not amount to &#039;supply of tangible goods for use&#039; (STGU) service liable to service tax. The Tribunal found that the transaction involved the transfer of the right to use the generators, constituting a deemed sale rather than a service. As a result, the appeals filed by the Appellant and its Director were allowed, and the demands for service tax, penalties, and interest were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>