https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417092 Once execution of the cheque and signatures are admitted, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act operate in favour of the holder, and the accused must rebut them by showing a probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. On the evidence, the accused failed to displace the presumption of legally enforceable liability. The Court also restated that revisional interference under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited, and concurrent findings based on proper appreciation of evidence are not to be disturbed absent perversity or legal error. en-us Wed, 24 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:48:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417092 Once execution of the cheque and signatures are admitted, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act operate in favour of the holder, and the accused must rebut them by showing a probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. On the evidence, the accused failed to displace the presumption of legally enforceable liability. The Court also restated that revisional interference under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited, and concurrent findings based on proper appreciation of evidence are not to be disturbed absent perversity or legal error. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417092