https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300171 Non-appearance by the assessee and absence of any adjournment request led the ITAT to treat the hearings as ex parte and dismiss the connected appeals as unadmitted. The tribunal noted that an adjournment had been granted on the first date, but no one appeared on the re-fixed date. Relying on its precedent in CIT v. Multiplan India, the bench held that procedural default justified dismissal without examining the merits, and all six appeals were accordingly dismissed as unadmitted. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:47:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300171 Non-appearance by the assessee and absence of any adjournment request led the ITAT to treat the hearings as ex parte and dismiss the connected appeals as unadmitted. The tribunal noted that an adjournment had been granted on the first date, but no one appeared on the re-fixed date. Relying on its precedent in CIT v. Multiplan India, the bench held that procedural default justified dismissal without examining the merits, and all six appeals were accordingly dismissed as unadmitted. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300171