<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27723</link>
    <description>The court held that the interest paid by the assessee on borrowed funds could be disallowed under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee was overturned, and the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, awarding costs and counsel&#039;s fee to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27723</link>
      <description>The court held that the interest paid by the assessee on borrowed funds could be disallowed under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee was overturned, and the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, awarding costs and counsel&#039;s fee to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>