<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1559 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300174</link>
    <description>The Court declared the detenu&#039;s continued detention under Ext. P1 null and void, ordering immediate release. The rejection of the detenu&#039;s representation before the Advisory Board was found to violate legal principles and the detenu&#039;s rights under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal precedents and constitutional rights, leading to the nullification of the detention order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1559 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300174</link>
      <description>The Court declared the detenu&#039;s continued detention under Ext. P1 null and void, ordering immediate release. The rejection of the detenu&#039;s representation before the Advisory Board was found to violate legal principles and the detenu&#039;s rights under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal precedents and constitutional rights, leading to the nullification of the detention order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>