https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300178 UGC Regulations, 2010 were binding only on the institutions covered by the scheme, and were directory for State universities unless adopted by the State Government. Where valid Central higher-education standards conflict with State university law, the Central regime prevails to the extent of inconsistency, but no operative conflict arose because the State had not adopted the 2010 scheme. The post of Vice-Chancellor was treated as an officer of the University, not a teaching post, under the State University Act. On that basis, the appointment was upheld and the State framework remained effective. en-us Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:47:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300178 UGC Regulations, 2010 were binding only on the institutions covered by the scheme, and were directory for State universities unless adopted by the State Government. Where valid Central higher-education standards conflict with State university law, the Central regime prevails to the extent of inconsistency, but no operative conflict arose because the State had not adopted the 2010 scheme. The post of Vice-Chancellor was treated as an officer of the University, not a teaching post, under the State University Act. On that basis, the appointment was upheld and the State framework remained effective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300178