https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300179 Preventive detention challenge became infructuous because the detention order dated 15 March 2014 was limited to one year and was not extended, leaving no live controversy for adjudication. The Supreme Court therefore dismissed the special leave petition as academic. Separately, the Court granted leave to file additional documents, recording that procedural permission notwithstanding the disposal of the petition as infructuous. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:47:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300179 Preventive detention challenge became infructuous because the detention order dated 15 March 2014 was limited to one year and was not extended, leaving no live controversy for adjudication. The Supreme Court therefore dismissed the special leave petition as academic. Separately, the Court granted leave to file additional documents, recording that procedural permission notwithstanding the disposal of the petition as infructuous. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300179