https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300161 Detention order was held vitiated because the detaining authority was not placed with, and did not consider, the Advisory Board report in the co-detenu's case. The report was a material circumstance relevant to the detention decision, and its non-placement meant the authority acted without considering an important document. That omission was treated as fatal to the detention order, which was quashed and the detenu directed to be released forthwith if not required in any other case. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:01:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300161 Detention order was held vitiated because the detaining authority was not placed with, and did not consider, the Advisory Board report in the co-detenu's case. The report was a material circumstance relevant to the detention decision, and its non-placement meant the authority acted without considering an important document. That omission was treated as fatal to the detention order, which was quashed and the detenu directed to be released forthwith if not required in any other case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300161