<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 26 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 28,000 from the assessee&#039;s income was upheld by the court. The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the alternative plea, linking the deposits to withdrawals from the previous year, was supported by positive evidence. The court held that the assessee was not debarred from taking such a plea, and the deletion of the addition was deemed correct under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The outcome favored the assessee over the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 26 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 28,000 from the assessee&#039;s income was upheld by the court. The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the alternative plea, linking the deposits to withdrawals from the previous year, was supported by positive evidence. The court held that the assessee was not debarred from taking such a plea, and the deletion of the addition was deemed correct under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The outcome favored the assessee over the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>