<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 507 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, granting them interest at a rate of 12% per annum on the amount deposited under protest during the investigation. The Tribunal determined that the amount paid under pressure during the investigation qualified as a deposit under protest, entitling the appellants to the interest claimed. Various case laws and the Tribunal&#039;s recent decision supported this outcome, leading to the appellants&#039; successful claim for interest on the deposited amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 507 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, granting them interest at a rate of 12% per annum on the amount deposited under protest during the investigation. The Tribunal determined that the amount paid under pressure during the investigation qualified as a deposit under protest, entitling the appellants to the interest claimed. Various case laws and the Tribunal&#039;s recent decision supported this outcome, leading to the appellants&#039; successful claim for interest on the deposited amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>