https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417036 The High Court allowed the respondent/complainant to amend the complaint to correct a cheque number discrepancy, despite the objection from the petitioner/accused. The court held that the mistake was genuine and based on information provided by the bank. The amendment was permitted as it did not prejudice either party, and all other details in the notice and complaint remained consistent. The court dismissed the Criminal Revision Case, upholding the trial court's decision to allow the amendment based on legal precedent. en-us Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:37:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417036 The High Court allowed the respondent/complainant to amend the complaint to correct a cheque number discrepancy, despite the objection from the petitioner/accused. The court held that the mistake was genuine and based on information provided by the bank. The amendment was permitted as it did not prejudice either party, and all other details in the notice and complaint remained consistent. The court dismissed the Criminal Revision Case, upholding the trial court's decision to allow the amendment based on legal precedent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417036