<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 497 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417032</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, upholding the validity of the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial was directed to be completed within six months, allowing the petitioner to present relevant documents. The court affirmed the responsibility of the company and its officers for the dishonoured cheques as per Sections 138 and 141 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 497 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417032</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, upholding the validity of the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial was directed to be completed within six months, allowing the petitioner to present relevant documents. The court affirmed the responsibility of the company and its officers for the dishonoured cheques as per Sections 138 and 141 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>